In a few days, Brazilians will return to the polls to choose, in a second round, the president of the Republic who will govern the country for the next four years. More than a dispute between candidates, the election should represent an opportunity to reflect on the enormous structural challenges that Brazil will have to face.
Among them, two deserve special attention: recovering the sustainability of public accounts and building a society in which opportunities for economic and social progress depend less and less on the condition of one’s birth. Although often treated as independent issues, these challenges are deeply related.
Brazil comes into this election with a worrying fiscal situation. According to data from the Central Bank, the gross debt of the general government, which represented 51.3% of GDP in 2011, reached 81.9% in June 2026. More worrying than its size are the growing trajectory of indebtedness and the high cost of its financing.
When debt grows persistently, the perception of risk increases, putting pressure on interest rates. High interest rates, in turn, increase the government's financial expenses, make credit more expensive, discourage investments, and hinder the expansion of companies and the generation of jobs. A perverse circle is formed that compromises economic growth and fiscal sustainability itself.
The social consequences are equally serious. The increase in debt charges restricts the resources available for investments and public policies. Education, early childhood, sanitation, infrastructure and professional training start to compete for increasingly limited portions of the budget. It is precisely at this point that fiscal sustainability encounters the central issue of social mobility.
Brazil remains a society in which family origin exerts enormous influence on future opportunities. Data from the Atlas of Social Mobility, developed by IMDS in partnership with Prospera Lab, show that only 8.3% of the children of families in the poorest 25% manage to reach the richest 25% in adult life. Among the children of families belonging to the richest 25% group, 56.5% remain in this position.
Breaking this persistence requires quality public policies, but it also requires economic growth, investment and the generation of good jobs.